• cholesterol@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    314
    ·
    4 days ago

    The dump truck, at 45 tons, ascends the 13-percent grade and takes on 65 tons of ore. With more than double the weight going back down the hill, the beast’s regenerative braking system recaptures more than enough energy to refill the charge the eDumper used going up.

    • ladicius@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      258
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      4 days ago

      So the energy this truck uses is harnessed via mining and loading… Essentially this energy was stored in the ore via geological processes.

      This truck uses continental drift as his fuel.

    • stoy@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      53
      ·
      4 days ago

      Kinda like the mine in the UK that use a cableway without a motor to bring ore down and empty buckets up

    • whyNotSquirrel@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      34
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      4 days ago

      So it was designed for this mine I guess?

      I’m not sure there’s a lot of mine you’re going down filled up, the images I have in mind are quite the opposite, but that’s a really cool idea!

      There actually is some design to stock energy this way, with weights you lift while having excess energy

      • groet@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        33
        ·
        4 days ago

        Depends on the scale of “going down”. Many mines are in the mountains and the material has to be brought down to lower elevations. The mine entry may be lower than the nearest pass but still a lot higher than the destination of the ore.

        • TomSelleck@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          4 days ago

          Open pit is much more common for this type of equipment and it’s basically a reverse mountain. Still might be enough regenerative braking from just the weight of the truck though.

          • NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            16
            ·
            4 days ago

            Still might be enough regenerative braking from just the weight of the truck though.

            In that case no, because it’d be bringing the weight of the truck and the ore with it.

          • groet@feddit.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            4 days ago

            An open pit at an elevation of 1.5km still means the bottom of the pit could be 1km higher than the place the ore is processed at

      • SomeoneSomewhere@lemmy.nz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        21
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        4 days ago

        If you’re thinking of that CGI crane lifting concrete blocks, it’s unfortunately a really bad idea.

        Pumped hydro stores energy by lifting weight uphill, instead. Water is basically the cheapest thing you can get per tonne, and is easy to contain and move.

        To store useful amounts of energy using gravity, you need pretty large elevation differences and millions of tonnes of mass to move.

        • Optional@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          4 days ago

          I love that I knew this conversation was going to happen as soon as I read the article.

          And, yes.

  • ChaoticNeutralCzech@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    112
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    4 days ago

    Amateurs.

    The 1963 Černý Důl – Kunčice nad Labem aerial ropeway is over 8 km (5 mi) long, over 30 m high in places and carries 135 tons of limestone every hour from a quarry to the nearest train station. Its 120kW 3-phase synchronous motor requires power for a few minutes at the start and end of each day when most of the 800kg-capacity trolleys are empty, and spends most of the shift generating mains electricity and acting as a speed governor. Unlike the EV, it is fully autonomous most of the way, only 5 people are required to operate it including loading and unloading. The quarry will continue operation as long as it pays off, then the ropeway will be scrapped (projected 2033). A dude illegally rode the way up on it somewhat recently.

    • SomeoneSomewhere@lemmy.nz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      4 days ago

      I wouldn’t be surprised if there are electrified railway lines doing the same. Regenerate large amounts of energy into the grid while descending loaded; consume a relatively small amount of energy to haul the empty train back uphill.

      • skillissuer@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        4 days ago

        I don’t know about going downhill in general, but there are some that use regenerative braking (regular braking, on flat terrain) so maybe

      • ChaoticNeutralCzech@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        4 days ago

        An early version of the Petřín ropeway in Prague used to contain tanks in both cars. The upper one would be filled with sewage collected rainwater from the city’s hilltop quarter and the energy of the descent was used to pull the other car up. Additionally, the way up cost twice as much so there was an incentive to ascend on foot, which was about as fast despite the incline.

      • bluGill@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        4 days ago

        Most mines are underground so for most this can’t work, but where it does they are sure to use it.

        • SomeoneSomewhere@lemmy.nz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          4 days ago

          Regular trains don’t run underground. Lots of opencast mines exist .

          Basically all mines have an above ground terminal where whatever you mined is unloaded from your underground trains, lifts, haul trucks or whatever else onto storage piles, then loaded onto the actual long distance trains.

          If the mine entry is up a mountain, then the trip down from that point will be a net energy producer regardless of anything else.

    • residentmarchant@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      4 days ago

      Content aside, what a great video! It’s not that old of a video but it reminds me so much of early YouTube, just friends messing around and posting it with top tier song choice.

      • ChaoticNeutralCzech@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        4 days ago

        Not very smart that they waste all that energy in mechanical brakes. See my comment (the one with the picture) for a way bigger and electricity-generating ropeway, including a video of a guy less squeamish than Tom Scott riding most of the 45-minute way up.

          • ChaoticNeutralCzech@feddit.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            4 days ago

            He literally has

            Filmed safely: https://www.tomscott.com/safe/

            in the description. Meanwhile, that fat dude from Vrchlabí jumped into a moving bucket of one that is faster, 2.5x longer, at deadly height, and his only plan of getting down safely was a mattress. He acknowledged how illegal and dangerous it is and yet publishes the video with his full name.

            Just accept it, Tom Scott was being way more cautious.

            • Aatube@kbin.melroy.org
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              4 days ago

              firstly I was joking
              secondly, cautious ≠ squeamish. we shouldn’t be setting masculinity as an example

  • sircac@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    4 days ago

    I cannot avoid to be pedantic on this, it is recharged during half the trip… it just does not require plug-like recharging

    • realitista@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      4 days ago

      Yeah another clickbait headline. It’s getting recharged all the time, it’s just very lucky to be in a use case where it goes down hills with large loads all the time

      • xthexder@l.sw0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        4 days ago

        It’s more than a clickbait headline, the first paragraph is just flat out wrong:

        Perhaps best of all, it consumes no energy doing it.

        Obviously it’s consuming energy going uphill. Just because the power source is gravity doesn’t mean it’s not consuming energy.

  • mEEGal@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    4 days ago

    well that was unexpected

    I’m curious if the desgin team knew about it in advance

      • mEEGal@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        4 days ago

        hahaha guess it boils down to that 😂

        but I was specifically wondering if they built the vehicle with a charger and ended up never using it, to their own surprise. or if they knew they’d (almost) never have to charge it

        • Venicon@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          4 days ago

          Must have a cable somewhere as a backup otherwise you’d need a full battery replacement should it ever be discharged.

    • Imgonnatrythis@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      4 days ago

      Gonna go ahead and guess that when designing a 110 ton mega dump truck things are probably pretty front loaded on the planning side of things.

  • Walk_blesseD@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    4 days ago

    “World’s largest EV”

    Blatantly untrue. Larger EVs have been in use for more than a century at this point in the form of EMU trains.

    • Glitterbomb@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      4 days ago

      I’ll pick up the pedantic torch. Trains are made of train cars, I’d argue each one is a separate car or vehicle even though they’re strapped together.

      I feel like The ISS ticks a lot of the boxes for a vehicle though, how big is that?

      • Walk_blesseD@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        4 days ago

        Sure, but quite often in EMUs the cars come in sets that can’t operate disconnected from each other, so I’d argue that they still comprise a single vehicle.

        I’d argue that the ISS, due to lacking means of propulsion (unless you count explosive decompression) is not a vehicle.

  • CheeseNoodle@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    4 days ago

    Very interesting use case but kind of dependant on this very specific setup? I feel like an even more efficient and low maintenance method would be like… a ramp.