jordanlund@lemmy.worldM to politics @lemmy.world · 4 days agoPortland’s ranked-choice debut causes voter engagement to crater; 1 in 5 who cast ballots chose no one for City Councilwww.oregonlive.comexternal-linkmessage-square62fedilinkarrow-up1133arrow-down17file-text
arrow-up1126arrow-down1external-linkPortland’s ranked-choice debut causes voter engagement to crater; 1 in 5 who cast ballots chose no one for City Councilwww.oregonlive.comjordanlund@lemmy.worldM to politics @lemmy.world · 4 days agomessage-square62fedilinkfile-text
minus-squarejordanlund@lemmy.worldOPMlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·4 days agoThe thing is, the system completely changed to a point where it’s not comparable. Old system: 5 city council members, elected city wide, vote for one person per seat, first past the post. New system: 12 city council members, elected 3 per district, rank 6, top 3 elected. So there’s more representation district by district, in fact, this is the very first time my district has had representation on the city council.
minus-squarevoiceofchris @lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up2·4 days agoIf you cannot compare the previous voter engagement to the current voter engagement then why title your post in such a way? Why blame ranked choice voting for “cratering” voter engagement if you have no metric by which to judge that?
minus-squarejordanlund@lemmy.worldOPMlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·4 days agoBecause the title of the post a) comes from the original source and b) also has nothing to do with previous elections. 1 in 5 voters, in this election, failed to vote on the ranked choice options when presented.
The thing is, the system completely changed to a point where it’s not comparable.
Old system:
5 city council members, elected city wide, vote for one person per seat, first past the post.
New system:
12 city council members, elected 3 per district, rank 6, top 3 elected.
So there’s more representation district by district, in fact, this is the very first time my district has had representation on the city council.
If you cannot compare the previous voter engagement to the current voter engagement then why title your post in such a way? Why blame ranked choice voting for “cratering” voter engagement if you have no metric by which to judge that?
Because the title of the post a) comes from the original source and b) also has nothing to do with previous elections.
1 in 5 voters, in this election, failed to vote on the ranked choice options when presented.