• VintageGenious@sh.itjust.worksOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      16 days ago

      What a useless debate. Anyway they were asking why I was “condescending”, well if you shit on a voluntary work, just because it’s not at your taste, you are a shit person

      • pyre@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        16 days ago

        voluntary work doesn’t make you immune to criticism and no you’re not a shit person for criticizing any work.

        I’d say you’re a shit person if you can’t handle criticism though.

          • pyre@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            16 days ago

            talking shit is a completely different thing. and where’s the strawman? it feels like you don’t know what words mean.

                  • pyre@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    edit-2
                    8 days ago

                    I disagree. “It’s ugly” is valid criticism. It has the same value as “needs better/more appealing graphics”. You’re just annoyed it wasn’t sugar coded. In fact I’d argue the former is more valuable than the latter because it doesn’t beat around the bush and more importantly it points to a problem rather than the solution.

                    As a designer I find that most often customers don’t hit the mark by trying to design the thing themselves, telling me exactly what they want, essentially trying to do my job for me. Hearing the customer’s problems with it to figure out a solution on my own as a designer is better a vast majority of the time.

                    “I don’t like it” is bad. “I think it looks awful” is better. “I hate the colors” is best. I don’t really care about wording, I care about the information I get.