Polling experts point to ‘fake polls’ exaggerating his support, with baseless lawsuits alleging fraud already filed
  • Snot Flickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zoneEnglish
    41·
    21 days ago

    If I had any hair I’d be tearing it out because this has been readily apparent this was going to be the plan going forward since January 7th, 2021.

    I’m so tired of it being screamed from the rooftops and everyday it feels like the media forgot entirely about all of it.

    • Doom@ttrpg.network
      2·
      21 days ago

      Honestly the more they push stolen election and show no results the less effective it will be in future elections. They’re drastically losing their grip on power

      • Pete Hahnloser@beehaw.org
        4·
        21 days ago

        The sad thing is we lose, not them. We have some 35% of the country convinced that elections don’t matter. That’s tangentially a democracy problem, but good luck having a meaningful discussion about the the difference between a democracy and a republic.

  • masterofn001@lemmy.ca
    11·
    21 days ago

    For the thousands (millions?) of us who have known this since 2015, are we officially strategists?

  • Megaman_EXE@beehaw.org
    7·
    21 days ago

    I would love to hear how they plan to resolve what feels like an inevitable unrest that will one day erupt.

    I’m obviously not an expert on the subject, but the rhetoric has been so much more extreme. I hope nothing bad happens, but I have no idea how to get people to understand that an authoritarian government is bad. Do people even understand what that means? Or how living in an authoritarian state would affect their lives?

    • Jo Miran@lemmy.ml
      22·
      21 days ago

      It wouldn’t be a collapse. It would be a transformation into the most heavily armed fascist dictatorship in the history of the world. If we’re lucky, it stays isolationist, but it likely won’t.

      • queermunist she/her@lemmy.ml
        5·
        21 days ago

        It’s already in decay. A fascist turn would just destabilize society so much that the country breaks up into independent warring state-regions in a civil war. The US will probably nuke itself.

        • Jo Miran@lemmy.ml
          12·
          21 days ago

          That’s some high risk wishful thinking. A destabilized US needs to be contained very quickly or it could take the entire planet with it.

          • DdCno1@beehaw.org
            6·
            21 days ago

            There is nobody in the world that would be able to contain it. Nobody is even close to having the conventional power projection capabilities required for this. Even if “only” democracy ends in America and a dictatorship takes its place, the rest of the world is going to suffer horribly. In the short run alone, all sorts of autocratic regimes (Russia, China, Iran, North Korea, plus a couple others in South America and Africa) that were primarily or entirely limited by America’s global military presence keeping a lid on them would immediately cease the opportunity to turn entire regions of this planet into warzones. That alone is horrific.

            A complete breakup of America on the other hand (which could happen if a dictatorship failed to establish itself) could be a potential doomsday event, I agree with you. The economic shocks caused by this alone would send the world into chaos and that’s not even taking the danger of nuclear war (civil and global) into account.

            Even if we get an isolationist Trump administration controlled by the Kremlin, this would also be catastrophic, for numerous reasons, from weakening NATO to stalling and reverting desperately needed action on climate change. Hell, imagine another global pandemic, once again without anyone at the helm. Love or hate the US, it was clear that the lack of American leadership during COVID-19 was the primary factor responsible for the poor global response to it.

        • t3rmit3@beehaw.org
          4·
          21 days ago

          Nah, and I say this as an ansoc who would love for the US to break up, but there’s just no appetite for that at any scale large enough to actually cause this.

          Even at the time of the Civil War, it was only when state governments decided to secede that things kicked off, and no states now- no matter how “blue” they are- are going to try that. It would be up to individuals, and there’s just no organizational capability for that at the scale needed to force a civil war. The closest we might ever get is a bunch of individual attacks or small-scale violent mobs.

      • queermunist she/her@lemmy.ml
        3·
        21 days ago

        Those at the margins of the world will be saved from the long arm of the United States government.

        It’ll be pretty bad for US Americans though.

        • t3rmit3@beehaw.org
          6·
          21 days ago

          As much as the US is an imperialist colonial state, they also keep the other ones (Russia, China) in check. Both of them were subsumed by state-capitalism, and became just as expansionist and xenophobic as the US is. I don’t want any of them around, but all 3 breaking up ain’t in the cards right now, and unchecked imperialism is exactly what made the US so dangerous to the “margins of the world” for so long.

          • Pete Hahnloser@beehaw.org
            2·
            21 days ago

            I frankly haven’t believed in my own government since 9/11. This is not about conspiracy theories; it’s about the fact that I could drive into Canada in 2000 with a driver license. We obviously are the most imperial country in history (the irony is not lost on me, given how this all started).

            But we started doing things like creating the Department of Homeland Security when the DoD covered that alongside ICE. I don’t understand what it’s like to think those were insufficient.