There is a real political opportunity right now for a party to craft an agenda that speaks to men — and addresses their real problems.

Contrary to progressive belief, young men are not turning into a generation of misogynists. Support for gender equality continues to rise, including among men under 30. The problem seems more to be that many men simply don’t see much recognition of their issues, or even of their identity, on the political left.

If the Democrats are the “women’s party,” as one party strategist claimed, it might not be surprising that men are looking in another direction. The official party platform lists the groups it is proud to serve; women are listed but men are not. There is a new Gender Policy Council in the White House, but it has not addressed a single issue facing boys or men.

The failure to engage with men’s issues is proving to be a costly mistake, particularly in our politics and culture. The challenges facing many men, especially working-class men and men of color, are not the confections of the online “manosphere.” They are real. But they have not been sufficiently addressed, or sometimes even acknowledged. This has left a vacuum, which has been filled, in many cases, by more reactionary voices from the manosphere.

When problems are neglected, they metastasize into grievances. And grievances can be weaponized in service of reactionary goals. The solution, then, is almost comically simple: Don’t neglect the problems.

  • TransplantedSconie@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    25
    ·
    23 days ago

    I did read it.

    Two mental health bills are currently stalled in Congress.

    Guess which party is holding them up and which party sponsored them?

    • FuglyDuck@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      22
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      23 days ago

      So you read it and still felt like bitching about men not supporting women?

      (naw. I don’t really believe you. Also, what has two stalled bills that don’t really address the issues being faced? oh. by the way. the article mentions more bills that do. Details.)