• JohnnyCanuck@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    53
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    3 hours ago

    He’s talking about how long young people will last on the supreme court. Still gross, but this article is click-baity and dumb with its premise.

  • ColeSloth@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 hours ago

    That was a loaded headline, since he was referring only to Supreme Court judges who get to stay in for as many decades as they’d like.

  • Asafum@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    edit-2
    2 hours ago

    What an absolutely fucking ridiculous comparison…

    I hate defending Trump, but this is the difference between LIFETIME appointments vs maybe 4 years, 8 tops for president… He’s absolutely correct, you’re an idiot if you choose an old person to be a judge for SCOTUS since you open up the possibility of them being replaced sooner…

    In a world that isn’t completely corrupted by partisan hacks we shouldn’t care who ends up on the court, but because of billionaires we don’t get to have that world…

    BE BETTER MEDIA ASSHATS.

    :/

    • Clent@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 hour ago

      I hate defending Trump, but

      Then don’t. You aren’t obligated to defend him.

      I disagree with his sentiment. Higher turn over on the Supreme Court is part of the proposed Supreme Court reform.

      Defending him because “nuance” is stupid, he doesn’t have any, why project it on him? What has he done to earn it? This is how narcissists maneuver – people’s eagerness to see their good side; it doesn’t exist for the narcissists.

      • Wytch@lemmy.cafe
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        13 minutes ago

        This is like that “sanewashing” thing. “What he means is this…” no. No need to do him any favors.

      • Orbituary@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        54 minutes ago

        Then what you want is term limits.

        I don’t like Trump, but I get his point. It’s the same argument he makes about taxing the rich. Guess who has the power to fix that, too?

        People in power rarely make laws to limit themselves.

        • Optional@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          7 minutes ago

          “His point” makes it sound like he’s thought about it. I guarantee you he has not. This is a talking point he was reminded of five minutes before the planted question was asked and he almost blew that.

          Seriously, he’s demented. His only thoughts revolve around him and his money - that’s it.