• LeadersAtWork@lemmy.worldB
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    Intent, mostly. Other than that, not much. Because we can only assume why, even if it’s easy enough to come up with answers, it’s best to not leap to conclusions. I might be missing info though .

    • neclimdul@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 months ago

      I guess I don’t see the difference. If you are warning someone with a gun, the warning is that they willl use the gun. Legally that might not always be “terrorism” but the effect is the same so seems like we call it what it is.

      • bbuez@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        Last I checked, brandishing a weapon is not any more legal, nor is negligent discharge of a weapon.