• Zangoose@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      14 hours ago

      The lead developer changed the license to a much less permissive one because of drama surrounding being credited in modpacks. The dev thinks there are forks that exist solely to sidestep crediting the original mod, I’m not up to date enough on Minecraft modding lore to know if this is true or not.

      I’m pretty sure there’s also a fork that branches off of the last GPL commit but I forget what it’s called.

      • Opisek@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        13 hours ago

        Doesn’t GPL technically require you to attribute the upstream anyway?

        The work must carry prominent notices stating that you modified it, and giving a relevant date.

        • hendrik@palaver.p3x.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          12 hours ago

          Most open sorce licenses do, not just the GPL. I’m not sure what Minecraft modpackers do. But in the free and open source world, you’ll always find that attribution. Sometimes they have a list who wrote the software and who maintained it for what timespan.

          • Zangoose@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            7 hours ago

            Modpacks still have attribution but they likely have attribution to the fork. The fork will have attribution in the source code somewhere but most MC players aren’t likely to actually look at the GitHub repo, so they’ll only see the fork’s name.