It is soo good. A tech company i just got offer from. In their onboarding app, they let me join the union on the first day.

This is what you see in the company with strong union.

  • Septimaeus@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 months ago

    At the expense of profit? If control is preferable to operational stability, why do so many businesses use IT vendors?

    • frezik@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      They still have a leaver on outside vendors. And yes, power is ultimately their goal. If there’s a conflict between power and profit, they choose power.

      • Septimaeus@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        3 months ago

        OK just so we’re crystal, I’m only interested in fixing what’s broken. I have no time for doomerism, tedious conspiracies, or despair.

        • frezik@midwest.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          3 months ago

          What I’m saying is that you can’t go to businesses and say “a union will make this whole place run better for everyone” and expect them to take that for an answer. Unions have to fight. Some of those fights have been bloody.

          That’s not doomerism, tedious conspiracies, or despair. It’s what has happened already in the history of unions.

          • Septimaeus@infosec.pub
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            2 months ago

            Edit: You’re angry, hurt, jaded, and need others to feel your misery. I understand the feeling. What comes next, however, is the work. Angsty rage-baiting is a dead end.

            Of course, union battles are a matter of history. And yes, today the rational agents of global economies often see unionization as a threat, clearly.

            I argue that it’s only a threat insofar as it’s a disruptive paradigm. On the whole it’s a more fiscally advantageous schema for all but the monolithic “vertically integrated” international corporations that profit largely from self-dealing (and probably need to be broken up anyway).

            You said businesses prioritize “Control” and “Power” over profit — i.e. they are not rational economic agents but despots. It’s a bleak perspective since despots can’t be reasoned with, only overthrown, and moreover it dismisses economic theory entirely.

            I’m just weary of the defeatism. I know we’ve been through a lot and many of us are terribly jaded, but giving up is not an option. I want to win.

            • frezik@midwest.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              3 months ago

              moreover it dismisses economic theory entirely.

              Yes.

              I’m just weary of the defeatism

              I don’t see it as a defeat. I’m not saying give up. I’m saying know what we’re up against.