• chetradley@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 months ago

    I was proud to vote for Bernie in the 2016 and 2020 primaries, but I bit the bullet and phone banked for Biden even though he was far from my first choice. There’s way too much at stake here.

    • return2ozma@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      15
      ·
      7 months ago

      I volunteered for Sanders campaign but didn’t do anything for Biden. He didn’t earn my vote. Democracy at work.

      • chetradley@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        7 months ago

        I honestly get where you are coming from. I protest voted green party in 2016 thinking Hillary had the election in the bag - and felt terrible afterwards. Voted for Biden in 2020 even though he was low on my list. Without seriously overhauling our voting process to ranked choice or STAR voting, not voting for one of the major party candidates just helps the other.

        • Hathaway@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          7 months ago

          Maybe I’m a naive idealist, but, in the age of social media I actually tend to disagree. If there’s ever a time that a 3rd party could be plausible, it’s now. Everyone hates both sides, social media and the internet gives anyone a platform.

          The notion that you cannot vote for anyone else is and has been pedaled by both sides for too long. It’s tired and false.

          I don’t see either party being willing to pass something that in-essence, weakens their stance, so voting reform is likely dead.

          Idk, this country is fucked. Like I can even easily go counter myself as I type this. You’re probably right. I just don’t want to believe it. I’ll likely be voting democrat anyway, simply cause my soul knows you’re right. Fuck.

          • chetradley@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            edit-2
            7 months ago

            I’m all for having choices outside of our de-facto two party system, but the reality is that the more progressive candidates we have, the more it splits the progressive vote. Our adversaries know this, as part of the Russian election interference involved social media posts encouraging progressives to vote for Green Party candidate Jill Stein. Stein claims she had no involvement, but there have been accusations that she has ties to Russia, particularly stemming from this gala she attended. A senate investigation found no wrongdoing on her part, however.

              • chetradley@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                7 months ago

                Which part of my comment could be considered slander? I thought I was presenting the facts as they are, and even mentioned that she denied any knowledge of the Russian election interference done to promote her campaign and split the progressive vote.

        • return2ozma@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          7 months ago

          Blame the candidate that works for the people. Not voting for Biden helps Trump? I guess not voting for Trump helps Biden too then?

          • chetradley@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            7 months ago

            If you’re a conservative voter and you refuse to vote for Trump for one reason or another then it does help Biden. The problem is that conservatives are rallying behind Trump pretty much regardless of what he does, while progressives are infighting about whether to vote for Biden because of his stance with Israel.

          • trafficnab@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            7 months ago

            Not voting for the lesser of two evils helps the greater evil, whoever you think that might be in this election

  • NegativeLookBehind@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    7 months ago

    In the past few elections, voting feels more like a hostage situation than exercising my right to making a “choice”. This country is absolutely fucked if Trump is elected again.

    • surewhynotlem@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      7 months ago

      Yes. That’s the end game of our type of voting system. You get two options and both suck.

      We will get no progress until we get something like ranked choice voting.

        • tigeruppercut@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          7 months ago

          If we can at least get 2 dems in a row in office we can begin to claw the Overton window back from the fascist side. It’d be a start at least

          • Socsa@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            7 months ago

            This is the part too may people fail to understand. The same reason Trump wasn’t able to completely dismantle democracy in 4 years is why Dems can’t check every progressive box in 4 years. The system is designed to require a decade or more of electoral success to enact real change. Otherwise you’d just have an unsustainable political yoyo.

            Even then, Trump winning one time has completely fucked the Supreme Court, and US democracy will unequivocally not survive another Trump pick. A ton of allegedly left leaning people here seem suspiciously enthusiastic about that prospect.

          • Cowbee [he/him]@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            7 months ago

            That’s far too naive. All that will do is entrench liberalism, which is extremely weak against fascism rising.

    • fidodo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      7 months ago

      We need to focus on smaller winnable races. Unfortunately we can’t shortcut our way into the presidential candidates we want, we need to replace the establishment and build a foundation of allies to support it. I know a lot of us are in conservative areas where you can’t realistically get new candidates elected locally, but you can still volunteer for races in other parts of the country. If we can shift politics in the house and Senate the presidency will follow. It’s hard work but it’s possible.

    • lennybird@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      7 months ago

      Easier said than done I know but if Trump wins my wife and I would strongly consider emigrating to another country. There’s only so much insanity one can take before needlessly going down with the ship. And if the calculus is that that my kids will have better prospects elsewhere, then so be it.

      • Doc Avid Mornington@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        7 months ago

        Fascism is on the rise globally. If enough decent people leave the US, we will fall into a fascist regime, and it will be the beginning of World War Three, with the US leading the equivalent of the Axis powers. No place in the world will be safe for you or your children. That’s the hard, honest truth.

        • Kaity@leminal.space
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          7 months ago

          With my partner, friends, and I being “degenerates” and likely the first group the fascists genocide… nope, see ya, I’m out. We already are experiencing the low-tide effects of genocide and while people aren’t in droves killing us yet, there are state allowed murders seemingly popping up and medical genocides creeping into the states. It’s only a matter of time and there is effectively nothing I can do, so for the lives of my family, friends, and I, we will be doing whatever it takes to get out before it really starts.

          • Doc Avid Mornington@midwest.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            7 months ago

            You must do what you feel is right, of course. I disagree that it is inevitable, I disagree that there is nothing you can do, and as I said above, I doubt that, should it happen, anybody will be safe, anywhere; but I wish you and yours safety and peace, wherever you go.

    • Bamboodpanda@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      7 months ago

      It always has been.

      We might be tempted to think that our Democratic heritage automatically protects us from such threats. This is a misguided reflex. In fact, the precedent set by the founders demand that we examine history to understand the deep sources of tyranny and consider the proper responses to it. - On Tyranny by Timothy Snyder (Chapter 1, Page 13)

  • jobby@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 months ago

    Citizens United needs to be removed.

    The massive polarisation in the media needs to be addressed and the outright blatant lies told by the Rightwing goons needs to be legally stopped. ‘Free Speech’ my ass. They need to be labelled ‘opinion’ or ‘entertainment’ or something other than pretending to be ‘fair’ or ‘news’.

    • Bytemeister@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      Ελληνικά
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      7 months ago

      I think an “equal air time” law that requires that corrections to misinformation and disinformation be provided at the same scope, scale and duration as the offending material. Since Fox news backed down on their dominion case, they ought to reprint every article, rehost every show and re-run every ribbon and banner on all of their platforms for next 3 years, admitting that they lied, linking sources to proof of their lies, and advising everyone that 2020 had no meaningful amounts of voter fraud on either side. Failure to do so should be fined at a rate of 1000 dollars per second of missed remediation time.

      • Saracha@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        7 months ago

        Unfortunately the law would’ve never applied to fox news, as it was broadcast only and cable was exempt. But even so nowadays so much of the information sphere is online, through Facebook, Twitter and the thousand different right wing blog news sites that you aren’t really going to be able to stop anything. The American system very dependent on the two parties having a bipartisan consensus. But after a few decades of the right wing media sphere whipping the base into frenzy after frenzy the ‘true believers’ are the ones in government now and the idea of compromise is done for.

        • Quadhammer@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          7 months ago

          That all breaks down though when you can point to foreign actors stirring the pot. Republicans are really letting other countries decide their fate at this point

    • thecrotch@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      7 months ago

      The massive polarisation in the media needs to be addressed and the outright blatant lies told by the Rightwing goons needs to be legally stopped. ‘Free Speech’ my ass. They need to be labelled ‘opinion’ or ‘entertainment’ or something other than pretending to be ‘fair’ or ‘news’.

      Replace “rightwing goons” with “leftwing commies” and this is exactly Trump’s plan lmao. Do you not see how that is a problem?

      • SupahRevs@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        7 months ago

        What left wing media empire has spread lies so much as to be sued for hundreds of millions of dollars? This is not a two sides issue.

        • thecrotch@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          7 months ago

          I’m not pushing it as a two sides issue. I haven’t seen anyone in the Democratic establishment advocating for media censorship like this. I’m talking about you, as an individual. You’re not a side.

          • jobby@lemmy.today
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            7 months ago

            I’m not advocating ‘censorship’. I’m advocating for standards of truth in news media. Unless it’s laid out as the facts, it’s opinion.

            This used to be the case until Murdoch and the GOP changed the law to allow bullshit.

            • thecrotch@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              7 months ago

              If you’re talking about the fairness doctrine, it required broadcast networks to devote equal time to both sides of controversial issues. It never applied to opinion shows, which are like 2/3rds of the content on 24 hour cable news networks, and it never applied to cable. You could bring it back tomorrow and it wouldn’t change anything about Fox News.

              There is not, nor has there ever been, a legal ‘standard of truth’ for news media. There shouldn’t be. If you trust the government to decide what is true and punish the media for reporting otherwise, what’s to stop trump or the next trump from weaponizing that? That is why the first amendment exists.

  • WarmSoda@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    7 months ago

    Don’t forget, Sanders is the only person Trump has ever admitted he’s afraid of.

    • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 months ago

      Dems really underestimate what life is like for normal Americans. trump doesn’t get it either obviously, but at least he acknowledges shit is bad for them.

      If Biden tries to run in the economy it’s going to hurt him because all the money is going to the wealthy.

      Bernie acknowledges and actually has a plan to fix shit. And unlike trump points the finger at whose fault it is.

      trump can’t compete with that.

      But neoliberals don’t want to really address wealth inequality either.

        • ChonkyOwlbear@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          7 months ago

          Biden is the only thing standing between democracy and fascism in the US. Hate it all you want,but that is the reality at the moment.

          • chakan2@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            7 months ago

            Biden isn’t standing between anything…he’s a speed bump. We still lost our reproductive rights, Trump’s tax cuts are still in place, we are still sending money to Israel and not the Ukraine.

            Biden sucks. Don’t vote for Trump…but god it’s fucking depressing that the only alternative is a guy with Alzheimer’s and a meme army for political clout.

            • Socsa@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              7 months ago

              You lost your reproductive rights because a bunch of Sanders bros decided they’d rather let Trump win than vote for Hillary.

              • chakan2@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                7 months ago

                Am I the only one that remembers the DNC was sued over that…and Sanders won?

                • Socsa@sh.itjust.works
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  7 months ago

                  Over what exactly? The only lawsuit the Sanders campaign filed was over a misunderstanding over how a DNC voter database was configured. Both candidates had access to the same modeling and turnout software, and the Sanders campaign was mistakenly able to access data and models Clinton had generated because the system was not configured correctly. He sued when that mistake was corrected, but quickly dropped the suit when the issue was clarified.

                  The lawsuit against Wasserman-Shultz was from a voter group, and it was dismissed. Maybe I’m missing one though. Can you jog my memory?

          • HardNut@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            7 months ago

            Please stop being so dramatic, you shouldn’t be afraid to talk to other people about their political opinions.

            • MegaUltraChicken@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              7 months ago

              It’s not fear, it’s that no one wants to read the same half assed logic that boils down to actively supporting efforts of conservatives to put Trump back in power. This shit strategy is getting old.

              The winner of the 2024 general election for POTUS will be Donald Trump or Joe Biden. In a FPTP system any eligible vote not cast for Joe Biden is supporting Donald Trump, a member of the minority party. This is math. You are going to support one of these candidates if you’re eligible to vote. It is mathematically impossible to sit out and not have influence.

              Not a single one of the commenters trying to depress Democratic votes has provided a single alternative argument to these facts. It’s not a real argument. It’s just trying to create apathy so conservatives can gain more power.

              You can talk about Democratic principles all day long, voting is a strategic play. And if you were actually trying to defend Democratic principles you would take the action that results in the least harm, which is Joe Biden, not Donald Trump.

              • HardNut@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                7 months ago

                You are discussing strategy to avoid the most harm. Harm avoidance. That’s fear. You are literally describing fear without using the word fear and acting like I was the one misunderstanding. You need to understand that you are acting on fear. It’s ridiculous, and I was right to point it out.

                You mentioned my other comment in passing like it meant nothing to you, then say that no one hear has given any real arguments? Maybe you just need to read in better faith. You clearly don’t have any respect for my concerns with Biden if your comment demonstrates a complete unwillingness to even entertain the thought.

                Canadian btw, you don’t need to convince of anything to do with voting strategy anyway. Wasted energy. I just think you guys are being really silly and can’t see the forest from the trees. You could probably use third party observers to get your heads on straight.

                • MegaUltraChicken@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  7 months ago

                  Zero interest in trying to convince you of anything. I just want everyone else to understand that listening to you acts against their own interests. Either you don’t understand how our electoral system works, or you’re misleading people to try and put your thumb on the scale in support of some pretty horrible people.

                  Waiting anytime for an explanation of how Trump getting elected benefits the situation in Gaza btw. Or do we not care about that now because that would be acting out of fear?

    • lennybird@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      7 months ago

      Take with a grain of salt, considering Putin says Biden is better for him than Trump. While I don’t necessarily agree with the argument, Republicans (and centrist dems) certainly believe Sanders would’ve been an easy target for smear campaigns.

  • quitenormal@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    7 months ago

    I know you mrrrkns absolutely hate it when furriners’ talk about your politics, but it saddens me to see a fellow democracy in such a state. Both these guys are demented old f&@ks! These are the best candidates your democratic system can give you? Really? I know we Aussies have plenty to cringe about, but jeez!

    • harsh3466@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      7 months ago

      Yeah. It’s super frustrating living in the United States and having these two old fucks as the voters choice. To be clear, I’m voting Biden, because he and the Democrats are the lesser of the evils by a pretty large margin, but they both fucking suck.

    • Formesse@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 months ago

      Trump is a result of the systems failure to address underlying problems. The underlying problems can all be associated with a single common source: Inflation.

      Governments printing money at a rate greater than value is created in the economy, nets you inflation - and that has been going on since around the mid 90’s in a very real way, and even before that. We can more or less call this the “NeoLiberal Era” if you like. Around the 90’s is when things get bad - and to more or less cover it up, the CPI was manipulated (read: Fixed like you would fix a wrestling match) to make inflation look acceptable - in reality: Replace Steak for Ground beef in the CPI shopping cart and tell people it’s still relevant.

      End of the 90’s you get the ,Com bubble and crash. 2008 Market Crash - and you get “Quantitative Easing” being sold as a fix - when all it is is, PRINTING MONEY. Then during the pandemic a huge push to shut down the economy (largely impacting the lowest wage earners the hardest just FYI) requiring the government to provide stimulus, coupled with grands, loans, and such to businesses in hopes they would keep people employed (hint: They didn’t). And so we have had a series of the most NeoLiberal thing possible: Publicize the risk, privatize the profits, and screw the poor over in the process.

      The fix: Reduce the Money Supply. Drive to a negative inflation number. But the kicker is? The wealthiest hedge funds, realestate investors, and what not would basically go belly up from that type of move. And why? Because if inflation lowers - the debts accrued cost more to maintain the interest on, than they can gain with inflation flipping for real profit over time. Once you reduce the money supply by at this point about 2/3eds - we can move to aiming for a 0% inflation number. The government should at that point be focused on reducing debt one way or another.

      The real problem for the US Economy is, if any action is taken to reduce the debt - it will be a clear signal that the US economy is not gaining value, and that the Dollar Value is currently overvalued. And that could in a very real way cause a spiral. And a fear of the Spiral is making the long term problem worse as it’s kicked down the road.

      By the way: You can take the US out of this and replace just about any western nation into the mix and find the same problem. Actually, China really fits in here. And oh boy a correction is coming and it’s going to be ugly.

  • electric_nan@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 months ago

    Is there a real plan to shore up our “democracy” if the Democrats win this election? What is Biden going to do next term that he didn’t do this term?

    I feel like people are so fixated on Trump that they can’t see past him. Trump is a giant, clown-shaped piece of shit-- absolutely. How does the opposing party fail at politics so hard that someone like Trump ever even had a shot?

    • fine_sandy_bottom@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      7 months ago

      I don’t think there really can be a plan. Like what would you want Biden to do to shore up democracy?

      One of the inescapable, fundamental, bedrock concepts of democracy is that people will not vote for a corrupt, criminal, authoritarian, self serving demagogue.

      If a society can’t achieve that basic state then they can not be a democracy.

      Honestly, I suspect that the best thing Biden can do is to “grey rock” the American people and hope that Trump self combusts, which seems to be what’s happening.

      That said, that’s just the best Biden can do. The dems need an actual leader that can inspire the american people to see a better version of themselves.

      • electric_nan@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        7 months ago

        Did you mean to have the word “not” in your second paragraph? Because people absolutely vote for leaders like that all the time lol.

        Oh I think I see. I agree that we’re not a real democracy.

      • electric_nan@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        7 months ago

        OK? What if Biden wins, is my question. Is the Democrat value-proposition nothing more than “periodic intervals of slightly slower slide into total fascism”?

        • dangblingus@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          7 months ago

          In what way have the Democrats advocated for sliding into fascism? They’re status quo politicians, not wannabe dictators like some other orange person.

          • electric_nan@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            7 months ago

            Intervals of “status quo” between fascist administrations is slow-walking into full fascism.

          • electric_nan@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            7 months ago

            Fuck man, I’ve got a lot I guess. Like the kind of shit the Repubs do, but the Dems claim powerlessness to do. Trump has shown that the rule of law only matters if there is some consequence to breaking it. So break the law. Wield the power. Especially if you genuinely feel like this will be the last ever election. Fucking declare an emergency, arrest Trump and everyone else involved in J6. Send the military to reassert power over the national border in Texas. Break up media monopolies, and nationalize telecoms. Why the fuck would you risk losing an election to a criminal gang who want to end democracy?

            • Tinidril@midwest.social
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              7 months ago

              All those possibilities pretty much went out the window when the Democrats nominated Biden. Even if Biden was as left as we would like him to be, he is a technocrat who sees the norms as vital to maintaining the legitimacy of government.

              I don’t even necessarily disagree that maintaining legitimacy is vital, but I’d put representing the people over donors a notch higher than maintaining norms.

              • electric_nan@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                7 months ago

                I don’t actually think they were ever possibilities. Even if Bernie had won, his own party would have trampled over the repubs in order to impeach him first lol.

                • Tinidril@midwest.social
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  7 months ago

                  I don’t think so. The more people actually hear Bernie speak, the more they like him. He wouldn’t be hiding from the public like Biden, he would be leading rallies on the Whitehouse lawn. If Bernie had access to the bully pulpit, impeaching him would be political suicide.

            • Bytemeister@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              Ελληνικά
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              7 months ago

              The supreme Court is slow-rolling determining whether or not a president is liable for criminal activity in office until after the election. If they determine now, then either trump gets held accountable, or Biden has immunity from crimes in office, and can plainly jail or order a hit on trump and a good chunk of Congress.

              Obviously though, the president is not immune from the consequences of crimes committed while in the office.

              • electric_nan@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                7 months ago

                I just don’t understand how you can believe that the supreme court can’t or won’t just ignore precedent.

            • sailingbythelee@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              7 months ago

              Your suggestions are very tempting, I must say. We don’t want to sleepwalk into fascism. It could be 1930s Germany all over again.

              Trump and many of his gang were arrested already, though, and are facing trial. So far, the verdicts have shown that the justice system is still somewhat functional. I don’t think it makes sense to flip the table as long as the justice system continues to hold Trump and his ilk accountable. Taking it to the next level and declaring an emergency would accomplish what, exactly? He has already been charged, so would the point of the emergency declaration be to skip the trial phase and go straight to hanging? Essentially it means outlawing Trumpism, which means purging the GOP, which means civil war. No one wants civil war as long as there is a chance to beat Trump constitutionally.

              We had a situation in Canada in the 90s where our second largest province had a very serious vote on whether to separate from Canada. It would have literally ended the country as we know it. It was certainly tempting to arrest the leaders for treason to save the country. However, that would certainly have led to either a civil war or the Quebecois equivalent of the IRA in Canada. So, we persevered through the vote and the remainers won by about 1%, as I recall. We saved the country by the skin of our teeth, but through legitimate democratic means, and so the result was respected.

            • Bigfoot@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              7 months ago

              Democracy cannot be permanently “fixed”, it can only be preserved via endless education and participation.

              Literally the only way to “fix” democracy is to participate in it.

              • electric_nan@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                7 months ago

                OK? How does that happen? Is there a Dem plan to drive democratic engagement, because they obviously haven’t done a good job of it yet. It seems like fear of Repubs is the main selling point to voting Dem, and it isn’t exactly a thrilling strategy.

                • trafficnab@lemmy.ca
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  7 months ago

                  More people voted for Biden in the 2020 election than any other candidate in American history by a pretty significant margin, voter turnout in both midterms and general elections are at their highest points in 100 years, obviously something is working

                • Bigfoot@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  7 months ago

                  How does that happen?

                  It happens when I go canvas and vote, not complain about it on the internet like you.

          • Linkerbaan@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            7 months ago

            No there is a lesser chance. The worse the conditions get for the more support fascism gets.

            If Trump does not win this election, an even worse person will win the next one

            • TheKingBee@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              7 months ago

              This, so much, this, I feel like I’m taking crazy pills.

              The Democrats are ideologically incapable of dealing with fascism, they will not address the root causes, America will have an authoritarian in office within 8 years.

              Quite frankly if America can’t withstand trump’s decrepit, corrupt, senile version of fascism then we’re just going to fall to what ever ghoul the Republicans summon next.

      • Scientician@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        7 months ago

        But what can you really do? Not voting is beneficial to the open christo fascists, and the only person who has any real world shot at winning an election, for some mind melting reason Joe Biden. The same Joe Biden, who despite his kinda actually not terrible first term, is currently funding a genocide as the wold watches. It’s a shit choice, but this problem isnt going to be fixed this cycle. It’s like punching the clock.

        • Numberone@startrek.website
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          7 months ago

          Biden isn’t the only one who could win, and seems to be worse off than a generic dem in swing States, by a long shot. They’re choosing the candidate again, like they did with Hillary, from the ranks of the least popular people in the US. They’re shooting themselves and blaming the left and Muslims in MI already.

    • Tinidril@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 months ago

      I agree that it’s frustrating that Democrats use shitty Republicans as an excuse to be just a tiny bit less shitty. However, it’s getting really annoying that you can’t criticize Trump without someone chiming in with “whadabout Biden?!” and you can’t criticize Biden without getting a “whadabout Trump?!”

      • electric_nan@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        7 months ago

        They’re both fucking awful. It’s a waste of time criticizing Trump because everybody knows who he is, and the people that like him don’t give a fuck what he does. They aren’t listening to your criticism. I’m don’t think Dem leadership really wants to actually help working class people, but they definitely don’t have much reason to start when people keep voting for the most “conservative” ones out of fear from the monsters which have mysteriously found a way to represent the other half of voters.

        • dangblingus@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          7 months ago

          As far as Democrats go, Biden is amazing. He’s supported Israel no more than Obama or Clinton did. He’s forgiven tens of billions in oppressive student loans. He enacted a funding bill that will finally establish a HSR network in parts of America. He rolled back disastrous Trump era policies on immigration. He fixed Trump’s disastrous COVID response. He re-established relations among NATO countries and was paramount in alerting the world that Russia was about to invade Ukraine when we all knew Trump was trying to weaken their military with his quid pro quo scheme.

          In your opinion, how has Biden failed America?

          • SupahRevs@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            7 months ago

            To add to this. Biden has passed significant investments in growing manufacturing jobs in the US the results we won’t really see for years. Planting a tree that he will never enjoy the shade of. He has approved renewable energy projects and initiated much needed improvements to energy transmission so more renewable energy can be in the grid when they are built. Biden has done a lot to advance our infrastructure.

    • fidodo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 months ago

      The more he loses the less likely he’ll be to win, plus he’s old as hell and not aging gracefully. Rebuking Trumpism is shoring up democracy.

      • electric_nan@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        7 months ago

        Didn’t we rebuke Trumpism last election? I’m asking why the fuck is Trumpism alternating as the most popular political position for the American electorate. This is an indictment of the political acumen of the Democratic party.

        • Furedadmins@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          7 months ago

          We did but facism will never go away. Before they slunk away but now fascists can connect with each other online. Instead of it being a few people that happen to meet up and connect now they can seek each other out. It’s the same reason that racism has made such a dramatic resurgence. It will literally require eternal vigilance.

          • electric_nan@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            7 months ago

            Is this how it is in all countries? An eternal choice between “whole fascism” and “skim fascism”?

    • lorty@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      7 months ago

      You know they don’t . Their strategy was, is, and will continue to be: “The other side is worse”.

    • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      7 months ago

      Just ask about DC statehood and the Dems’ inability to enfranchise over a million US citizens.

      As soon as you scratch this problem, you discover how shallow and unserious the party is in “protecting democracy”.

      • electric_nan@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        7 months ago

        I agree, I’m just trying to get others to see how little “resistance” the Dems pose to the more naked fascism of the Repubs.

    • Sp00kyB00k@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 months ago

      Sometimes in life there is such a thing that is called: “Maybe there is no Good Vs. Bad just assholes all around”. Good luck with that

  • TheKingBee@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    7 months ago

    If trump wins and America can’t defeat his senile version of fascism, then it’s already on the death bed waiting for the next republican to take power…

    trump is the best authoritarian we’re going to get, he’s easy mode, the republicans will get someone worse, someone who has the ability to think beyond his next shit.

    It’s not going to get better only worse…

    • stebo@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 months ago

      how were republicans before trump? how was Bush? (i literally have no idea because I was 7 at the time)

      • Ultraviolet@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        7 months ago

        Nixon, Reagan, Bush Sr., Bush Jr., and Trump are all links in the same chain of shit. If any of them were avoided we’d be much better off as a nation.

          • Linkerbaan@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            7 months ago

            Bush started multiple wars and killed millions of people by lying about WMD’s and blamed Iraq for doing 9/11 which was done by Afghanistan but actually by Saudis. And Bush passed many spying acts and abolished rights.

            Trump bombed Suleimani and withdrew from Afghanistan. That’s it for foreign policy.

            Bush was infinitely more worse than Trump. Trump just looked really dumb

  • Alsephina@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    7 months ago

    I like the insinuation that the US is an actual “democracy” lmao

    • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      7 months ago

      If we do an election and the wrong candidate wins, the democracy goes away.

      So you can’t vote for the wrong candidate.

      And also, you can’t vote for a third-party candidate.

      And also, you can’t abstain from voting.

      So, really, you have exactly one choice that you’re allowed to make.

      Democracy!

      • iquanyin@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        7 months ago

        but “allowed” is not accurate. you’re allowed to do any of those things. it’s just that all of them blow, and one blows less.

        • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          7 months ago

          There’s downticket stuff and that shouldn’t be ignored.

          At the same time, we get meager media coverage of the downticket races so its very difficult to discern who is good and who sucks unless you’ve got an in-group to turn to. I like to pretend I’m active in Dem circles, but I’ll be damned if I know who to vote for on my state senate seat much less all the judiciary races. The one guy I liked to primary out the loathsome Liz Fletcher turned out to be a serial sexual harasser.

          But yeah, pretending my vote in Texas will swing the national election is absurd. And then trying to tie that national election vote back to “Oh no, democracy is ending if you don’t vote for my guy!” is even fucking dumber.

        • RGB3x3@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          7 months ago

          We could actually improve our democracy by making voting mandatory.

          We’d get a better representation of how all of the voting-age population feels.

          Then maybe we can get politicians that support more thorough voting system reform.

          • quitenormal@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            7 months ago

            We could actually improve our democracy by making voting mandatory.

            In Australia, we’ve tried that. I have to say, that I personally, am not a fan.

            The consequences of forcing politically ignorant or complacent people to vote is that they end up deciding the result of the election, and you just get skilled used car salesmen as your politicians. They know all the buzzwords and three word slogans to keep the politically apathetic tuned in.

          • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            7 months ago

            We could actually improve our democracy by making voting mandatory.

            Brazil has mandatory voting, and its just as rife with corruption and fascism as anywhere else. I like the idea of compulsory enfranchisment simply because it operates as a counterweight to disenfranchisement. A state with a legal duty to vote is one with a legal obligation to fully implement elections infrastructure (at least, in theory).

            But when it comes to the quality of candidates? Well… Bolsonaro was not a paragon of civic virtue.

          • iquanyin@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            7 months ago

            you’re right, now that i think about it—as long as gerrymandering gets banned at the same time. because guess who doesn’t want most folks to vote? the R party. you know, the one that wants to rule, not govern.

      • Alsephina@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        7 months ago

        It never was, or was ever meant to be, an actual “democracy”. Imperial core countries’ political systems only serve to protect capital and imperialism, with a thin veneer of “democracy” to discourage uprising and two parties to divide the working class.

    • PugJesus@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 months ago

      It’s a good thing no one who was ever democratically elected dismantled democracy so they could never lose the power they gained.

      • blazera@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        7 months ago

        1, he’s been elected before, yet we’ve still got our election system. 2, democrats are actually trying to dismantle democracy by denying a huge number of voters the ability to vote for their choice for president. Dont by hypocritical, flip the roles around and imagine Trump or republican states are the ones barring Biden from running. It’s not gonna sit well with you is it?

        Democracies mean the people decide, even if that goes against who you want to win.

        • BigWheelPowerBrakeSlider@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          7 months ago

          If Biden committed the acts and, as of now alleged crimes Trump has been accused of, then Biden would need to be barred too. That’s the difference with Trump supporters, the rest of us want the laws applied no matter which “team” the politician represents. It’s people over party and not the other way around.

    • Blackbeard@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 months ago

      Man, it’s crazy how similar that sounds to exactly what Biden has been saying all along:

      And I’ve said many times before: I believe we’re at an inflection point in this country — one of those moments where the decisions we’re about to make can change — literally change the trajectory of our nation for years and possibly decades to come.

      Each inflection point in this nation’s history represents a fundamental choice. I believe that America, at this moment, is facing such a choice. And the choice is this: Are we going to continue with an economy where the overwhelming share of the benefits go to big corporations and the very wealthy? Or are we going to take this moment right now to set this country on a new path — one that invests in this nation; creates real, sustained economic growth; and that benefits everyone, including working people and middle-class folks?

      That’s something we haven’t realized in this country for decades.

      Here’s the simple truth. For a long time, this economy has worked great for those at the very top, while ordinary, hardworking Americans — the people who built this country — have been basically cut out of the deal.

      And I’ve said this from the time I announced I was going to run: I believe this is a moment of potentially great change. This is our moment to deal working people back into the economy. This is our moment to prove to the American people that their government works for them, not just for the big corporations and those at the very top.

      Yet an off-the-cuff remark about asking wealthy people to accept slightly higher taxes is somehow all his breathless detractors want to pretend has ever existed.

  • shalafi@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 months ago

    Funny how many comments just went poof! Gone! So this place is basically /r/politics now? Mods smoking out every opinion they don’t like?

    Funny thing is, the deleted comments were from liberals, not raging conservatives spewing bile and lies. Must not have passed the purity test.

    • lingh0e@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 months ago

      Or maybe the mods are actually moderating by cutting out the off-topic arguments and BS threads that don’t contribute anything to the overall discourse of the discussion.

      • Jode@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        7 months ago

        I can imagine most of the comments were 14yo’s and trolls saying GeNoCiDe JoE hUrRrR

      • fidodo@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        7 months ago

        Is there a way to filter by post? It’s hard to find anything when it’s everything from all communities.

    • ZK686@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      7 months ago

      My thoughts exactly. Why is it that these “politics” sites just end up going completely Left? Is this “politics” or “Democrat Politics?” I get confused… apparently, the Right isn’t allowed to have an opinion any where anymore…

      • Tinidril@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        7 months ago

        Does the right still have anything left to say that isn’t hate speech? The entire conservative economic schtick has failed the reality test so badly that most conservatives don’t even want to talk about it anymore. It’s all border wall nonsense, election denial, and reactionary isolationism now, and that’s the saner half of conservatism.

        • ZK686@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          7
          ·
          edit-2
          7 months ago

          Yes. I’m Mexican American, family came here from Mexico, legally in the 50’s. Worked hard, and established a great life. We were raised in a strict Catholic household, so, ideally, my family always votes Republican. This doesn’t make us horrible people. We simply believe in different things than Liberals/Democrats. However, I’m also a firm believer in Gay Rights, Abortion, and social programs. But, I think there needs to be limits, rules, and restrictions on a lot of that stuff. That’s where most of my political beliefs start to lean more Right. Sounds like you’re just profiling based on what you read on Reddit and Lemmy. That’s like me saying all Democrats and Liberals are anti-gun, anti-religion, and hate white people We know that’s not true.

          • Tinidril@midwest.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            7 months ago

            We were raised in a strict Catholic household, so, ideally, my family always votes Republican.

            Political parties are not like sports teams and you aren’t required to vote for a particular party just because you were born into it. Anyways, there is no correlation between being Catholic and voting for Republicans. Also, Biden is Catholic, and Trump is not - just in case you think that’s relevant.

            This doesn’t make us horrible people.

            I never said anything about you being horrible. My comments were directed at the current state of Republican policy and rhetoric, not the personal character of Republican voters.

            I’m also a firm believer in Gay Rights, Abortion, and social programs.

            Your Pope is also a firm believer in social programs. He doesn’t support Gay Rights and Abortion, but he takes a very different stance on them than Republicans.

            But, I think there needs to be limits, rules, and restrictions on a lot of that stuff.

            So do Democrats. I’ve noticed this tendency for people on the right to make these kinds of sweeping statements that sound like fundamental policy positions but are really so meaningless that anybody could say they support them. “I believe in small government.” “I am against excessive regulation.” etc. No real point there, I just find it interesting.

            The biggest curtailment of the welfare state in the least 100 years came from the Clinton administration. Obama’s biggest safety net accomplishment was Obamacare, which was originally a plan from the extremely right wing Heritage Foundation.

            You’re just profiling based on what you read on Reddit and Lemmy.

            No, I’m really not. Again, my comments were on the current state of Republican policy and rhetoric, so “profiling” doesn’t come into it. This goes back to my point about sports teams. My observations are also based on what I see coming out of Republican politicians and media figures. Conservatives on Lemmy, and especially Reddit tend to keep largely to their own insulated communities, and I don’t often visit.

        • ZK686@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          7
          ·
          7 months ago

          I think there should be limits and restrictions on social programs. I believe in tough on crime, funding more police, not less. I believe that we should be allowed to question the billions being sent to Ukraine, without being told we’re traitors and spineless. The Republicans are the ones trying to limit the amount of money we send all over the world, and for some reason, this makes them the party of the “bad guys.” I’m against many ultra liberal views, like allowing petty theft to go unpunished, allowing the homeless crisis to grow in California because apparently, it’s “not their fault.”

      • Soulg@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        7 months ago

        You’re allowed to have an opinion and we’re allowed to tell you that your opinion sucks