Texas State Rep. James Talarico using biblical scripture to tear down conservative Christian arguments

  • casmael@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    Ahh yes I too remember the well known and oft quoted bible passage “and then the Lord said unto him, ‘place a picture of your dingus on the wall in every room’ and then after he had said it, he laughed unto himself, saying ‘hehe I wonder if they’ll actually do it’ “

  • assassin_aragorn@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    This is why it’s really handy to be well versed in the Bible – it’s very easy to throw their shit right back in their face. Know their bible better than they do.

    • AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Matthew 5:17-9 says that all old testament laws still apply

      Matthew 6:5 says not to pray in public or flaunt your religion.

      Matthew 19:24 says that no Christian should have any disposable income.

      Timothy 2:12 says that Christian women may not proselytize

      Peter 2:18 says The Christ himself condones slavery

      Psalm 137:9 says that those who kill babies in the name of the Lord are glorified for they are exterminating the next generation of “Our Enemies”

      There are a ton more. I’ll add as I remember them.

      Numbers 5:11-31 is the only time that the entirety of The Bible or The Apocrypha even mention abortion. Those verses tell you how to perform an abortion. (In possibly the worst way, and for the worst reasons imaginable) This literally makes The Bible Pro-Choice.

      I’m intentionally ignoring the incest and lots of logical holes in the Old Testament as much as I can, because I want to poke holes in what these modern “Christians” believe.

      Edit 3: Oh! Oh! This shit contains so many verses to deploy against evangelicals. http://www.benjaminlcorey.com/could-american-evangelicals-spot-the-antichrist-heres-the-biblical-predictions/

    • IchNichtenLichten@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      More knowledge is always a good thing but religious texts can and are twisted to suit an agenda all the time. We can’t go back and ask the authors for clarification so we’re left arguing about what a person believes the text means.

      • Froyn@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        That just leads to another debate of who wrote the damn thing.

        Hint: It wasn’t God or Jesus, but it won’t stop them from guessing those two first.

        • IchNichtenLichten@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          The earliest text in the New Testament was written around 50 years after Christ’s death. There’s no definitive account of his life because the accounts in the gospels are sometimes contradictory. It’s messy, almost like it was written by a bunch of people recounting stories they heard rather than it being the literal word of God.

      • Kecessa@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        But they (the right) usually quote it by removing all context and by only using snippets of the text so there’s no interpretation required, in which case it’s very easy to retort by using the same tactic or by quoting the whole passage.

        Heck, just telling them that “it’s written all over the place in the Bible that only God has the ability to judge” takes care of most of their message.

        • IchNichtenLichten@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          True, but if you bring facts, logic, and citations to a discussion about belief and faith then all it takes is, “that’s not the interpretation I choose to believe” to end the conversation.

    • fakeman_pretendname@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      They’re fine with the Old Testament, it’s got plenty of treachery, rape, slavery and fraud cheered on by God, mixed in with smiting and destroying things that disagree with you.

      They have a problem with the teachings of Christ in the New Testament, which is all a bit too “someone was different to me so I made friends with them and we ate together”.