• m-p{3}@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      I wouldn’t expect that kind of price anymore except for the Zero models.

      • helenslunch@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        8 months ago

        I don’t expect it either, which is why these things don’t make sense anymore, and why I actually recently passed them up for an X86 competitor. Prices of RPi’s have inflated, supply has gone down to nothing, and all the while all sorts of competition has entered the SBC scene that provides a much better value.

        Don’t get me wrong, I love the RPi and I feel like a real cool nerd with bare PCBs sitting around my house, but they’re just too expensive now.

        • AggressivelyPassive@feddit.de
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          8 months ago

          Yep. The initial idea was to have a cheap SBC, that you could give to an entire classroom without being worried too much if some of them break. 35€ are not exactly cheap, but doable. 80-90€ is simply not viable for that purpose anymore.

          At the same time, for more serious projects, it’s lacking too many features like sata, pcie, etc., etc.

          I feel like RPi is coasting on momentum, without a clear direction.

          • grue@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            8 months ago

            The initial idea was to have a cheap SBC, that you could give to an entire classroom without being worried too much if some of them break.

    • ashok36@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      The cheapest rpi that isn’t a zero or pico started at $35. You can buy a Pi 4 Model B 1GB for $35 on pishop.us right now.

      The pi 5 won’t ever be $35 because that’s not the price point it was designed to hit. That’s why they have a range of products, so you can buy the one that fits your budget.

      • helenslunch@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        8 months ago

        Can’t do much with 1GB. And the Pi4 isn’t part of a “product range”, it’s the previous generation product.

        • ashok36@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          8 months ago

          Of course the pi 4 is still part of the product range. It’s still being actively manufactured and sold. Same for the pi3.

          As far as memory size, that wasn’t part of your original complaint. You want a $35 computer, that’s how much you get. The original pi was $35 and had 256mb of ram.

          -edit also, $35 in 2012 is $47 today with inflation. The pi 4 is a crazy good deal and readily available. This complaint just has no merit.

          • helenslunch@feddit.nl
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            8 months ago

            Of course the pi 4 is still part of the product range. It’s still being actively manufactured and sold.

            Its a 5-year old product. With 5 year old specs.

            As far as memory size, that wasn’t part of your original complaint.

            Yes I also didn’t specify a clock speed, storage size, network speed, etc. What I meant was a modern version of an old product with similarly modern specs.

            $35 in 2012 is $47 today

            And yet the Pi5 starts at $60.

            You’re also missing the other half of this conversation where other SBCs have come way down in price.

            Le Potato, Orange Pi, Zima products, Rockchip, not to mention all the X86 mini PCs, old office PCs, etc.

            • ashok36@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              8 months ago

              This is just goal moving at this point. And stating just plain incorrect facts. I’m out.

                • ashok36@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  8 months ago

                  I didn’t ignore anything. You edited your reply to make it look like I did.

                  I replied at 7:31GMT. You replied to that at 7:34GMT. You edited your original post at 7:44GMT for some reason.

                  This isn’t reddit where you can’t see when or if someone edited their comment.

      • circuscritic@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        8 months ago

        Completely abandoned their original hobbyist customer base and sent all their inventory to B2B sales channels and scalpers for several years.

        And now that they’re finally providing B2C vendors with stock, they’ve jacked up the prices by 100% to 300%.

        Don’t forget the Raspberry Pi foundation was supposed to be a nonprofit and the only reason they’re the premier SBC is the community. Other boards have better specs, at a better price, with better features. The community support, the hobbyists, are the primary reason why they are what they are.

        That’s just one bad action, but their had been plenty others recently. Some other comments here have provided information you should read, such as hiring police officers who specialized in using Pi’s for surveillance…

        • twei@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          8 months ago

          Tbh I can understand why they dedicated all of their stock to industrial customers instead of individuals. If back then they’d put all of their stock on the open market, it would’ve been scalped instantly. But what’s even more important is that there are businesses who’s products rely on the Pi being available, and tbh I’d rather have businesses using a Pi for their products instead of having to switch to a proprietary solution that nobody can service in 5 years.

          Also: if you ever really needed a pi, you could’ve asked them via e-mail and they’d hook you up with one or a couple

          • EmilieEvans@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            8 months ago

            The issue was they didn’t direct the stock to the industry. They directed the stock to large customers and the small companies had no inventory at all for years or were squeezed (by the market) to the limit with a Pi4 going for $200 and more instead of $50.

            The Pi CEO already went out in an interview and was like we did the right thing and would do it again. As such it was pathetic (to me) when they launched the Pi5 and were like community first. To be honest, they probably know that they need initial community support/software packages to sell it to their primary customer: Big companies.

        • DanForever@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          8 months ago

          The price is more or less the same as it’s always been, where is this nonsense 300% coming from? Are you quoting scalper prices as retail?

          • circuscritic@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            8 months ago

            I’ve bought, owned, and used, Pi’s since the original. The Raspberry Pi 5 is the first version that I will not purchase and deploy, so fuck off with your bullshit and go back to shilling for YouTube advertisers, or whatever other corporate interest tickles your fancy, just take it somewhere else.

  • ShortN0te@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    8 months ago

    The 3B+ was probably the high of the raspberry pi. It is still pretty much unrivaled in terms of idle power consumption and energy efficiency (or at least i have not seen any other SBC that got below 0.5 Watts on idle) on the consumer market.

    But i have trouble investing further into them.

    1. They do not post any update guides for newer Debian releases and basically only support new deployments.
    2. It looks like they are abandoning their older products. vcgencmd for example is still broken on the 3B+. Since they “fixed” it for the 4B. See https://github.com/raspberrypi/firmware/issues/1224
    • mosiacmango@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      Does it have dual band wifi, wide software support, dual 4k output at 60hz, 4gb of ddr4, NVME support via addon?

      Your cheap thin client likely isn’t a modern computer. The PI 5 is, and costing another $30 isnt exactly a roaring failure.

      • ShortN0te@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        8 months ago

        Most ppl do not bother to calculate that in(especially idle consumption) or living in an area where it basically does not matter.

        But yes, no x86-64 device comes close.

  • Linkerbaan@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    8 months ago

    Pi 5 sucks massive balls.

    They now require a special power supply for it to work else it just crashes under load. Their use of USB C is insanely confusing because it doesn’t work with any normal USB C psu.

    This power supply costs 15 bucks which conveniently isn’t included in the price. Also a heat sink that costs 6 bucks.

    Also they stuck with micro hdmi which sucks. (even more special accessories needed)

    The required accessories almost cost as much as just an old pi.

    I hope the community jumps over to Rockchip based boards soon. Pi has taken the communities open source efforts and spit in their face.

    Risc5 is also interesting but that seems to be a far bigger task since it need recompilation of a lot of existing stuff

    • InputZero@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 months ago

      Is there a RasPi alternative that’s competitive in price and has PCI-e support? It’s been a dream project of mine for quite some time to pair an ultra low power SoC to a GPU in order to make a crazy overpowered Folding@Home or BOINC cluster.

      • Linkerbaan@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        8 months ago

        I could say the Orange Pi 5, however Orange Pi’s ports currently tend to only work with specific accessories which they already wrote drivers for themselves. It’s not like they’re blocking other devices, but just like how RPI still needs a lot of work to support GPU’s with drivers, Orange Pi probably needs even more.

        The integrated GPU is pretty good though.

        Most alternatives to RPI use a Rockchip such as the RK3566 for mid range and RK3588 for high end stuff.

        There’s also the new cheap 15 bucks LuckFox Pico with Rockchip RV1106 with a small NPU for AI projects, kind of a Pi Pico alternative.

          • Aniki 🌱🌿@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            8 months ago

            Id recommend avoiding Orange anything until they can unfuck their flashing software.

            Fucking windows-only chinese shitwear. Fuck Orange Pi. I’ll never buy another one.