• Excrubulent@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    28
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    73 million is so much money I wouldn’t know what to do with it in my entire lifetime.

    Its ~0.3% of the ~20 billion twitter has lost.

    Rich people live in a different universe.

    • dependencyinjection@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      They’re flawed people.

      I would stop at £1M. I’m not going to earn more than that before I die. But free time is far more valuable.

      Everybody has different goals, but honestly does anybody even need to pass £10M. Broken hoarders is what they are.

  • Generative@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    1 year ago

    It’s essentially a defederated Mastodon instance. Quite impressive that it can it lose 75 million.

    • db2@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      1 year ago

      That’s the one thing he’s good at, losing other peoples money.

    • 14th_cylon@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      it might very well be a way to steal these 75m from someone… probably from some morons contributing to his fight to make america great again or something. he is a fraudster after all and it would make total sense.

  • AnAngryAlpaca@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Can someone explain how this website lost millions? Given that this size was not that big, I fail to see how it could cost this much in admin and Server cost. Even some better known commercial shops will hardly hit 5digits in monthly server costs, plus salaries for 1-3 admins and support staff, and maybe advertising costs.

    37million sounds like something they pulled out of thin air, maybe for some bookkeeping fraud or tax write off…

    • Chaotic Entropy@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      The classic Trump way, receive investment money and then pay yourself that investment money and more. Take out loans in the company’s name and eventually asset strip it to pay yourself again.

  • 👁️👄👁️@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    1 year ago

    Wtf did that money even get spent on? They just used mastodon code, so they needed like one or two coders. Traffic was shit so it can’t be that much for hosting.

    • Joker@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      1 year ago

      $23M of the loss is from the first half of this year. There was a $10M regulatory settlement and another $11M spent on “legal investigations”, which covers the bulk of that. I don’t have the time nor the inclination to really dig into it, but you can look at the filing here: https://www.sec.gov/ix?doc=/Archives/edgar/data/0001849635/000119312523276045/d408563ds4a.htm

      They lost $50M last year. I haven’t looked at that filing so I don’t have a clue what they spent that on besides $5M on “legal investigations” in the first half.

      This company is a total scam. It’s basically a slush fund for Trump. What would probably be more of a bombshell than the spending is where the money is coming from. It’s all but guaranteed that it’s primarily foreign money. Probably also some rich MAGA wackadoos buying influence.

  • Alien Nathan Edward@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    1 year ago

    eh, the next filing will show that it made $200 billion. The one after that will insist that it never existed in the first place.

  • some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    This news makes me wanna create an account and set automation to reload over and over just to cost a bit more electricity. But I’ve got better things to do.

  • Jimmycrackcrack@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Was it meant to make money? I mean, I think it’s just basically like old fashioned campaigning materials and propaganda, it’s just taking on the new interactive dimensions of social media and the perpetual campaigning of modern politics that Trump particularly is known for. Really it’s “profit” would be measured in outcomes rather than dollars, just as ad campaigns track numbers.

  • AutoTL;DR@lemmings.worldB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    This is the best summary I could come up with:


    The numbers were revealed in a new financial disclosure from TMTG’s SPAC merger partner Digital World Acquisition Corp.

    The filing indicates that, if TMTG is unable to complete the merger with DWAC, and receive the pot of money on the line, it may not survive.

    The amended S-4 filing also broke out a number of updates and risk factors related to the company, including the fact that the long-planned streaming video service appears to be off the table for now.

    The filing makes no mention of the service (which was teased with conservative comedy specials and “Trump-specific programming”) except in relation to layoffs.

    “This action followed a review of all departments, most significantly impacted TMTG’s streaming video on demand (SVOD) and infrastructure teams.”

    In May of 2022, Trump agreed to make Truth Social his primary social platform, agreeing not to post on other platforms until 6 hours after he sends a “Truth.” However, since initially signing the deal with TMTG, Elon Musk acquired Twitter and reinstated Trump’s account (he also rebranded it as “X.”)


    The original article contains 576 words, the summary contains 174 words. Saved 70%. I’m a bot and I’m open source!